The ADC FSW/FCA/RA Program is dedicated to meeting the needs of ADC clients through holistic advocacy and interdisciplinary teamwork to provide the best defense in their case. FSWs/FCAs/RAs work as full members of the criminal defense team and are covered by attorney-client privilege and confidentiality.
Special announcement text here
Contacts
Kevin Bishop, LCSW
Social Worker Coordinator
Claire Polini, LCSW
Social Work Outreach Coordinator
Useful Forms
- View All Forms
Related Pages:
- Join our Contractor Team
- FSW/FCA/RA Contact Page (contractor login required)
- MSW Student Internship Program (coming soon)
- Forensic Social Work Fellowship Program (coming soon)
FAQs
What is the difference between an RA and FSW/FCA contractor types?
What is an ADC Resource Advocate?
Resource Advocate contractors have experience and are skilled in case management and resource identification. Resource Advocates work as members of criminal defense teams with the sole purpose of identifying, navigating, and connecting clients with various resources, including access to housing, navigating public benefits, and connection with mental health/substance abuse services, etc.
RAs cannot create resources that don’t exist or assess a client’s clinical or mental health needs, but they are skilled in creatively navigating community, state, and federal resources to help client’s gain stability.
What is the difference between an OADC Resource Advocate (RA) and a Forensic Social Worker or Clinical Advocate (FSW/FCA)?
Resource Advocates are not mental health professionals or trained in mitigation gathering whereas all FSW/FCA contractors have a Master of Social Work degree (MSW) and are licensed (LSW or LCSW), working towards clinical licensure, or are a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC).
Teams should consider requesting an RA on cases that do not require mitigation gathering, a mitigation report, mental health investigation/consultation, expert identification but do need the invaluable help of resource navigation/connection.
When mitigation, MH investigation/consultation, clinical support, or help identifying experts are needs on a case, FSW/FCAs are an integral member of the team. When client needs are rooted solely in access to or navigation of services, a
Resource Advocate can target and address those specific needs. Resource advocates and FSW/FCAs can work in tandem on cases.
Please reach out to Claire Polini, LCSW with questions regarding Resource Advocate contractors at [email protected]
Is pairing social workers with lawyers a new innovation?
Social workers have been working alongside lawyers on legal matters since the beginning of the profession in the early 1920s and 1930s (Collins, 1932; Harris, 2020; Pound, 1927; Woods, 1905). By 1948 there were sporadic attempts to formalize the relationship between the social work profession and the legal profession, but the efforts suffered from a lack of ability to define the roles and activities that the social worker should engage in (Katz, 1961).
The understanding of what it meant for social workers to be involved in criminal cases was beginning to take shape in earnest in the 1970s and 1980s after Gideon v. Wainright established the right to an attorney for those who could not afford one for those accused of crimes (Ashford, Macht & Mylym, 1987).
During the 1990s public defenders, public defender offices across the country, and indigent systems around the world, saw the benefits from incorporating social workers on staff. Anecdotal evidence suggested that incorporating social workers on criminal defense teams resulted in better outcomes for clients with regard to their mental health, their issues with addiction, family problems, and importantly, with the legal outcome in their case (Sadd & Grinc, 1993; Sviridoff, Sadd, Grinc & Wright, 1991). Additional anecdotal evidence suggested that the inclusion of social workers on defense teams resulted in budgetary savings for county and state budgets.
Despite increased recognition that social workers on criminal defense teams are incredibly helpful on multiple measures of outcomes (financial, legal and social), there has never been one cohesive approach in either profession for establishing what working together should look like or what best practices should be. The reasons for this are too many to go into but the single most determining factor lies in how offices are funded and how that funding is eligible to be used. Some offices have relied on grant funding to allow them to provide additional ancillary services beyond the representation of the criminal case (such as helping clients sign up for Medicare and Social Security, etc.). Other offices or entities have elected to use grant money to offer follow-up counseling and other supportive services unrelated to the defense of the criminal case. Some new innovations have been to convince legislatures to join funding from departments of human services with public defense offices to allow for a broader, more holistic approach to helping clients shared by both systems.
In Colorado’s public defense system, social workers work on cases at the request of the attorney, beginning at or during the course of representation, and their services end when representation ends.
The first two social workers working on criminal defense cases in Colorado in any official capacity worked on a part-time basis for the Colorado Office of the State Public Defender via grant funding in 2005. The OSPD later combined both part-time grant positions into one full-time position as a state employee and hired another social worker full-time to work on capital cases.
In 2013 the ADC began a pilot program with two social work interns from the University of Denver, and those two social work interns took contracts with the ADC in 2014. The ADC intentionally created two full-time state employee positions to grow the Forensic Social Worker (FSW) / Forensic Clinical Advocate (FCA) capacity to meet the needs of clients and attorneys across the state on all types of cases. The ADC currently contracts with more than forty-five forensic social workers and forensic clinical advocates across the state, and the demand for their services is so far unabated.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Ashford, J., Macht, M. W., & Mylym, M. (1987). Advocacy by Social Workers in the Public Defender’s Office. Social Work (United States), 32(3), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/32.3.199
Collins, R. E. (1932). Contribution of social work to parole preparation. Journal of Criminal
Law and Criminology, 22, 864–872
Katz, Sanford N. (1961). The Lawyer and the Caseworker: Some Observations. Social Casework, Jan61, Vol.42 Issue 1, 10-15.
Pound, R. (1927). Law and social work. Indiana Law Journal, 3, 183–195.
Sadd, S., & Grinc, R. (1993). The Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem: Research results from the first two years.New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice
Sviridoff, M., Sadd, S., Grinc, R., & Wright, A. (1991). Developing and implementing a community-based defense service: Pilot operations of the Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem.New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice
Woods, R. A. (1905). Social work: A new profession. International Journal of Ethics, 16, 25–29.
What are the roles and practices of FSWs and FCAs? What can I expect from them and what can they do for me and the client? Can I call them as an expert?
You may have read earlier that the roles and practices of social workers on criminal defense teams (traditionally) and forensic clinical advocates (the ADC’s term for other mental health contractors) have never been clearly defined historically.
There are several models that have developed over the decades and different ways of approaching incorporating social workers on criminal defense teams. For several reasons the ADC has adopted the “hand-in-hand”, interdisciplinary model and for reasons tied to budgetary allowances, the social work and forensic clinical advocate’s work begins and ends with the beginning and end of representation. Additionally, the FSW’s and FCA’s work is directed at fulfilling the mission of the office and the legal team to zealously defend the criminal or juvenile delinquency case.
Interdisciplinary communication on a regular basis between team members about strategy, client needs, and mitigation and mental health evidence collected is the key to success for achieving the best outcomes for clients.
Operating under the hand-in-hand model ensures that the FSW/FCA is a full member of the legal team, covered by attorney-client privilege so that the team including the client can take full advantage of the FSWs/FCAs training and skills. In the hand-in-hand model the FSW/FCA will visit regularly with the client, review any records, conduct interviews with any relevant witnesses, and learn any information, regardless of whether it is favorable to the defense or not. When FSWs/FCAs are covered by attorney-client privilege their file is protected from discovery and they work under a pure advocacy assumption, meaning that they are one with the team and act as advocates for the client’s and attorney’s goals.
FSWs/FCAs can best help the client by participating in all team meetings and offering their candid perspective on issues related to mental health, how to navigate difficult issues with witnesses, and how to locate and develop mitigation evidence that is crucial to the defense of the case. It does not help you or the client to silo the FSW/FCA from learning any information. At the very least, keeping information from the FSW/FCA will limit their ability to help. In some circumstances it can create real problems for the defense by skewing information and recommendations that might adversely affect expert opinions, the court’s understanding of the client, or the district attorney’s trust in a good faith presentation of evidence from members of the defense team.
FSWs/FCAs have a skilled and unique understanding of how experts are likely to view the client, what types of experts should be hired based on the history and presentation of the client, and what types of evidence would likely help the experts understand the client’s unique presentation. FSWs/FCAs can, and should, be goal directed in gathering information and evidence from records and witnesses that will aid the experts in having a more accurate and complete understanding of the client than the expert would normally have the time to uncover. FSWs/FCAs can also help interpret records and should be consulted as to which records would be safest to turn over to experts in order to help the expert understand your client’s unique presentation. You might even encourage the FSW/FCA to write a report that constitutes a records summary of the relevant information and where to find it in order to point things out to your expert.
FSWs/FCAs are uniquely prepared to recognize and understand mental health symptoms and diagnoses from across the lifespan of the client. FSWs/FCAs are trained in open ended questioning and building the rapport necessary to elicit embarrassing and often humiliating information related to past traumas and dysfunctional family dynamics, both from the client and from other witnesses. FSWs/FCAs are also better positioned to know and understand the resources and the systems that people experiencing oppression and poverty have been served by in the past or are eligible for currently.
FSWs/FCAs will develop mitigation for you, the client, and the case. They will request and gather records, conduct mitigation witness interviews, they will uncover information based on the theory of mitigation supported by mitigation evidence and, if asked, they will write a mitigation report to present either to the DA or to the Court. This will free up your investigator to investigate the facts of the case. When appropriate and resources are available, FSWs/FCAs will offer recommendations to resources in the community that the client has voiced a desire to participate in and coordinate with the program to gain acceptance and entry for the client.
Lastly, FSWs/FCAs will support the client through the very difficult process that it is to be involved in a criminal case. At the direction of the attorney, FSWs/FCAs can advocate with detention facilities and prisons for appropriate treatment, advocate around medical needs, advocate against institutional abuses, and support the client’s emotional and psychological needs during one of the most difficult times a person can go through.
Important Dates
- Trainings and group supervision opportunities (coming soon)
- Clinical Supervisor Optional and Required meetings (coming soon)
- Social events (coming soon)